data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45630/45630c59b2d7b0a71a0d54cac2652c7495ab00ab" alt=""
What Lévi-Strauss believed he had discovered when he examined the relations between my themes was that a myth consists of juxtaposed binary oppositions. Influenced by Hegel, Lévi-Strauss believed that the human mind thinks fundamentally in these binary oppositions and their unification and that these are what make meaning possible. Furthermore, he considered the job of myth to be a sleight of hand, an association of an irreconcilable binary opposition with a reconcilable binary opposition, creating the illusion, or belief, that the former had been resolved. He came about this theory after analysing his own family as a self-contained unit consisting of a husband, a wife, and their children. Nephews, cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents all were treated as secondary. He believed that families acquire determinate identities only through relations with one another which he concluded to be true after analysing his family in detail. Thus he inverted the classical view of anthropology, putting the secondary family members first and insisting on analysing the relations between units instead of the units themselves. He looked at marriages like tribes and noted that the relationship between the uncle and the nephew (Old and young) was to the relationship of the brother and the sister as the relationship to the father and the son is to the husband and the wife. To simplify this and to allow this theory to be used outside the family unit he simplified the theory into letters- A is to be as C is to D. Levi-Strauss wanted to simplify the masses of the data he collected into comprehensible and understandable relations between units. This analytically study allowed him to produce his binary opposite’s theory.
Levi-Strauss supported the idea that a structure of narrative in films, TV and story plots are dependent on binary opposites. This includes a usual conflict between two qualities or terms, for example the difference between young and old, male and female, rich and poor. This creates the idea that binary opposites isn’t only linked to character identity, such as good vs evil, but can be linked to their class or social status also. Furthermore, binary opposites are linked to stereotypes, such as a man being labelled as strong, aggressive and independent whereas a woman is portrayed as weak, emotional and sensitive, emphasising the binary opposites of characters. These sets of opposite values often link to the revealing of structure in narrative, as stereotypically, if a narrative involved good vs evil it is likely that the character labelled good will succeed to events.
Binary opposition can also be linked to setting, for example if a house of a character is large and grand we are given the impression that they are rich and are a part of a higher social class, especially in comparison to another setting which could be based in a dingy flat with low saturated lighting to connote poverty.
Binary Opposites
|
|
Adult
|
Child
|
Alien
|
Human
|
Deceitful
|
Honest
|
Dependent
|
Self-sufficient
|
Industrialisation
|
Medieval
|
Male
|
Female
|
Mescaline
|
Feminine
|
Prisoner
|
Civilian
|
Organic
|
Technological
|
Technology
|
No technology
|
Violent
|
Harmless
|
[Alice]
Soap Opera examples of Binary Opposites
Carmel and Mercedes (Hollyoaks)
[Kira]
Tina and Carla (Coronation Street)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/047d1/047d19874f5a8bf4c60d13a59313eae0ffa4760d" alt=""
[Henry]
Bobby Ewing and J.R Ewing (Dallas)
Dallas: Bobby
Ewing and J.R Ewing: The two are seen as inseparable brothers in Dallas; always
sticking by each other’s side and never letting the other down. However, you
could easily split the two apart if it was down to the media binary opposites of good vs evil, portrayed by the brothers. There has
always been a highly competitive nature between the Dallas duo; J.R never
seemed to aspire to be like his brother, but construct his own way to destroy
what he had in order to bring them two back to the equilibrium. But Bobby was “the
nice guy” with charming smiles, sustainable success and filled with good will. This
was the thing that separated the two the most; the obvious outnumbering of good
and evil. This shows a stereotypical outlook on the couple of Bobby and J.R as the contrast of good vs evil is portrayed through an unconventional detail of the family unit that is supposed to connote unison and strong relationships.
[Henry]
The Dingles and The Macey's (Emmerdale)
[Kira]
Dot and Dotty (EastEnders)
EastEnders: Dot and Dotty:
“The family affair” duo were brought together by Dot’s money making devilish
son Nick, who so unthoughtfully dumped his daughter on her doorstep in order
that she would con her innocent grandmother out of hundreds of pounds. Putting this
story to the side, we can see a huge contrast between the young and old. We see
the difference between the two as Dot is the oldest resident in the square,
knocking into her late 80s, whereas her granddaughter Dotty has just about
entered the young age of 6. The cute, blameless dolly shoes are contrasted by
the beaten and battered brogues. The summery, floral dress infused with
colourful pigments, juxtaposed by the dull blue wrinkled laundrette uniform with
the never ending tea stain on the pocket.
[Henry]
Kat and Roxy (EastEnders)
EastEnders: Kat and Roxy:
they desperately fight over their love, Alfie Moon; however, they could not
be more different. Roxy; a blonde haired bimbo in her early 20s, youthful and
full of love although still portrayed in some light as feisty, like Kat, who we see as a hard faced woman with jet black hair, hard edged
red lip gloss and not to mention a highly provocative dress sense, which use to
be in the arms of her so beloved Alfie Moon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6087e/6087ef7f88cb6b7b598d4e1878c94a8d77783379" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6087e/6087ef7f88cb6b7b598d4e1878c94a8d77783379" alt=""
[Henry]
No comments:
Post a Comment